It is an surpassing time to be a PC hardware fancier – particularly when it comes to CPUs ! This preceding crepuscle , we sawAMDandInteltrade blows with their latest silicon . With benefit on both sides of the aisle , modern arrangement builders have a tough decision when it comes to deciding on a CPU weapons platform .
In our examination , we find that both Ryzen 7000 and 13th Gen Intel platforms provided fantastic operation , but they ran hot and were unbelievably power hungry . It ’s a big flex on both sides , really , but not an uncommon scheme — show off what the chip shot can do first and then fill in the ranks with a diverseness of pick .
And , withDr . Lisa Su ’s CES 2023 tonic address , we are about to see the Ryzen 7000 series merchandise quite a little bulk up ! enroll the 65W Ryzen 7000 Series processors .
Photo: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
We got our hands on AMD ’s 65W , “ non - 10 ” Ryzen 7000 Series CPUs to put through the paces . I know , I have it away – these are n’t the 3D 5 - cache variants that you ’re rub to see . Trust me : I ca n’t wait to see those in the natural state either . But hang in there ; AMD ’s leaner and gimcrack pick might just surprise you !
AMD Ryzen 7000 Non - X processor
AMD take superpower efficiency to the Zen 4 CPU Series without sacrifice a muckle of public presentation .
Photo: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
What is it ?
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 , Ryzen 7 7700 , and Ryzen 9 7900 : the 65W Zen 4 .
damage
Photo: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
$ 229 ( Ryzen 5 7600 ) , $ 329 ( Ryzen 7 7700 ) , and $ 429 ( Ryzen 9 7900 )
Like
Lower electric power / thermal , Great for smaller builds , Can be air cool ( coolers included ) , Unlocked for overclocking
Graphic: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
Dislike
Multi screw thread performance is good , but precipitate a bit too shortsighted to be a “ first choice ” for message creators , Value is a bit murky when looking at overclocking
Performance, Power, and Efficiency – Non-X Is Gon’ Give It To You
If the power haulage , thermals , and price range ofthe Ryzen 7000 series(or Intel ’s 13th Generation Core CPU series , for that affair ) have been prohibitive or off - putt to you , AMD ’s non - X Ryzen 7000 Series CPUs provide a solution to those problem without requiring too much sacrifice .
These non - X processor volunteer the same core numeration and cache size as their tight X - family extremity while turning down the TDP by a fairly significant margin , especially at the higher end . Lower index draw does translate into thin out foundation clock speeds across the production family , but the encouragement clock of the non - X processor incline just about 200 megahertz low-down than their 7000X twin . We ’ll go into more particular in a bit , but this is fantastic news show on a number of level .
For the environmentally conscious or those merely looking to keep their ability bill in check , the lower power draw means you have an option for a modern CPU that does n’t have to increase your utility utilisation . Is there a via media ? Sure . Is it worth it ? We ’ll talk about that in a mo .
Graphic: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
For those looking to build smaller form factor PCs or those that just do n’t swear anything but line cooling , the non - X Ryzen 7000 Series CPUs are designed for just that . AMD is so sure of that last part that it ’s bundling these CPU with Wraith air coolers – Wraith Stealth for the Ryzen 5 7600 and Wraith Prism for the Ryzen 7 7700 and Ryzen 9 7900 . Is that enough to subdue those blistering and beefy Zen core ? We ’ll talk more about that later .
With all of the features that the AM5 platform has to offer , such as AMD EXPO , PCIe 5.0 , DDR5 , and more , theNon - X Ryzen 7000 seriesshows some hope on newspaper , but can they deliver ?
Ryzen Non-X CPU Specs
When it comes down to it , the spec for the Ryzen 5 7600 , Ryzen 7 7700 , and Ryzen 9 7900 are , as stated above , very similar to those of their X - kin counterparts .
start at AMD ’s new entry - level CPU , the Ryzen 5 7600 remains a six - core , twelve - thread ( 6C/12 T ) offering . Its 3.8GHz radical clock leans closer to the 5600X ( 3.7GHz ) than the 7600X ’s 4.7 Gc . Max rise speed are a middling bit more exchangeable , with the 7600 further up to 5.1GHz – 200MHz shy of the 7600X ’s 5.3GHz . However , this is all done at athermal design package ( or TDP ) alike to the 5600X : 65W. Not too tatty .
Moving on to the Ryzen 7 7700 , we have an eight - core , sixteen screw thread ( 8C/16 T ) central processor with a base clock speed of 3.8GHz and max boost of 5.3GHz . For comparison with this generation of C.P.U. , the 7700X runs at a base clock of 4.5GHz and max boost speed of 5.4GHz , with a TDP of 105W. To look further back for comparison , the 5700X had a understructure clock of 3.4GHz and a max boost of 4.6GHz . While the 7700 leads the 5700X in overall speed , they portion out a similar thermal plan power ( TDP ): 65W.
Graphic: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
On the higher end , we have the Ryzen 7900 – a 12 - gist , 24 thread ( 12C/32 T ) powerhouse . Coming in at a base clock speed of 3.7 GHz and boost clock speed of 5.4 GHz , the 7900 tag its X - family vis-a-vis by the big gross profit margin ( 1GHz ) while hold in modest footstep at the top end . Again , for equivalence , the Ryzen 7900X has a home clock of 4.7GHz and a max boost of 5.6GHz . That , however , is at a thumping TDP of 170W – 105W more than the 7900 ’s 65W TDP .
Performance, Power, and A Picture of Non-X Zen 4 Performance
lash yourselves in , because what I am about to show you may bake your bonce … but with less overall power draw and heating .
We made every effort to keep our testing parameter as close to our previous Ryzen 7000 Series and 13th Generation Intel Core CPU testing methodology as possible . Since we swapped motherboards between earlier examination , we retested the original Ryzen 7000 Series vent alongside the non - 10 strain .
These numbers collected with our chart are out - of - the - box performance – no overclocking or no configurations tweak . The only features that we enabled were Smart Access Memory and an AMD EXPO visibility for dispirited computer memory latency and speed . The data from the Intel chips that you ’ll see reflect similar options .
Graphic: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
For comparison , we are going to include test data collected from AMD ’s Zen 4 release ( you may find our full reviewshereandhere ) as well as theCore i9 - 13900 K and Core i5 - 13600K. WhileIntel has declare its 65W Raptor Lake CPUs , we wo n’t be cast any comparisons to them . We will , however , be advert on data point that was collected forGizmodo ’s review of the Ryzen 5950X by Joanna Nelius .
Like with any examination , your mileage may alter ! It is important to keep in mind while drag comparisons between their data and mine that some testing environments were unlike , as was some of the equipment used for these tests .
Here is the computer hardware we used to collect our data from the Ryzen 7000 Series CPUs ( X and non - X likewise ): X670E AORUS Master motherboard , NVIDIA RTX 3090 Founders Edition GPU , 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z5 NEO DDR5 - 6000 RAM , 1 TB WD_Black SN770 M.2 NVMe SSD , NZXT C1000 Gold 1000W PSU , NZXT Kraken Z73 360 mm all - in - one liquid ice chest with three 120 mm fans , and an NZXT H7 elect mid - tower PC case equip with four 140 mm fans .
Graphic: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
Now , on with the show !
Benchmark Breakdown: Productivity
For our productiveness psychometric test , we ran the same entourage of software system benchmarks that we extend the earlier Ryzen 7000 Series and 13th Generation Intel chips through . These tests play up exclusive and multi thread performance in scenarios that evaluate how each CPU performs under a variety of computational loads .
In Geekbench 5 , we see a score relating to day - to - day , single thread undertaking – thing like web navigation , .PDF rendering , image densification , text compression , and more . Here we see the 7600 reach undivided thread performance within ~5 % of the 7600X while superseding Intel ’s Core i5 - 13600 thou by 2.85 % .
As we move up to the Ryzen 7 , the 7700 scored within 2.72 % of its juiced up chum , the 7700X , while trail the 7600X by ~1.5 % . This trend continues with the Ryzen 9 7900 . We say the 7900 non - disco biscuit comes within ~2.5 % of the public presentation of the 7900X , ~1.3 % of the 7700X , and ~1.4 % of the Intel Core i9 - 13900K.
Graphic: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
In the Geekbench 5 multi meat test , we see scaling performance from the bottom of the Ryzen 7000 series to the top . While the 7600 gets within ~6 % of the 7600X and the 7700 gets within ~4.6 % of the 7700X , the delta between the 7900 and 7900X is far more wide . There is an ~11 % carrying into action deviation at this stage .
While the 7900 does outstrip the Core i5 - 13600 K , it is nowhere near the multi core , multi thread power of the 7950X or the Core i9 - 13900K. However , when we count at these number from a generational standpoint , the Ryzen 7 7700 do so closely to the late generation ’s flagship CPU , the Ryzen 9 5950X. We ’ll see just how snug these two get in our next mental test .
For all of our video encoding friend , we ran the non - X central processor through Handbrake , converting a 4 K video file to a 1080p30 Indian file data formatting . While the pathetic 7600 had a rough clock time keep up with the rest of Zen 4 , the 7700 hung out with the former Ryzen champ , hovering at a 1 second difference of opinion better than the 5950X.
Graphic: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
In Blender , we saw a similar characterisation of multi core , multi screw thread performance as we submit everyone ’s pet shiny , red BMW . The 7600 kept in closer step with the 7600X this time , but the 7700 might have gotten bit too full of itself in the last troll . It fell 8 seconds behind the 7700X and a whopping 38 second behind the ever husky dad - bod of the 5950X. The 7900 , on the other deal , dissever the divergence between the 7700X and the 7900X nicely .
Benchmark Breakdown: Gaming
To limit as much GPU dependency as possible , we ran each of our gambling run at 1080p . This gives us the good picture of the CPU ’s shock on anatomy pace carrying into action . These tests were take from games that had synthetical benchmark , allowing for repeatable , consistent data point .
Instead of lumping all of the processor together in one chart , we ’re go to face them each within their production class . That way , you’re able to see a clearer side by side comparison .
After compiling all of the average across multiple benchmark runs , it ’s hazardous to see just how near these numbers are , especially with the Ryzen 7 7700 and Ryzen 9 7900 non - ten CPUs . We cite this in our initial look at Zen 4 , but it ’s deserving name again : Zen 4 as a political program is powerful at every price stage . With the non - X central processor , we have an even clearer pic of just how herculean it is . Not to leave the 7600 out of the conversation , the 65W Ryzen 5 held fairly tight to the 7600X ’s performance with fair beyond 1080p120 . Impressive !
Graphic: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
But , these number only say one side of the level .
Energy Efficiency and Thermal Performance
If we ’ve find out it once , we have probably learn it a hundred times by now : AMD ’s goal with Zen 4 was to lead the industry inenergy efficiencyand performance . Performance in unmarried and multi threaded tasks go punch for poke with the contender , but the concerning thing for us was the force consumption , heat , and the cost of moving to a new platform .
As noted originally , the non - X iterations in the Ryzen 7000 Series low overall TDP to be more in line with what we saw at the lower oddment of the Ryzen 5000 series . Just how broken is that , though ?
When it come to power consumption , we memorialize the socket data . This will read slightly higher in the charts than the list TDP , but these numbers pool do settle in parentage with AMD ’s specification for the CPUs max socket major power lot . Interestingly enough , if we had wanted to overclock the non - ten Ryzen 7000 CPUs , we could have . AMD is very proud of its committal to shipping its central processing unit in an unlocked state for overclocking . Since we were more concerned in out - of - the - box operation number , we decided to allow for that for another day .
Photo: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
What we see with power deliverance is pretty spectacular , specially when you look at the performance comparison . In our gambling tests , we saw some situations where the non - X CPUs had a similar power draw and execution to their X - family opposite number . However , we check some instances where there was a difference of 24W without a significant difference in performance . But those are just individual thread surgical operation in gambling .
When we look at some of the multi threaded tasks in productiveness , where the power livery cap out at around ~88W , we saw an over 100W conflict ! Keep in mind , that does render into surplus carrying into action … but that over two-fold power draw does not translate into double gains in performance . We ’ll utter more about this afterwards .
So , with lower power hooking in mind , how does all of this all translate to caloric performance ? And , does AMD ’s sureness in melodic phrase cooling these CPUs hold water … or air … or whatever chill method you choose ?
Photo: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
Again , to keep things consistent with our former test , we ran all of these trial usingNZXT ’s Z73 360mmall - in - one liquid cooler . The pump motor was arrange to execution mode , but all of the compositor’s case fan were coiffe to silent . This meant that the heart would hold out at about 70 % operational capacitance , then start ramping up to 100 % if the processor temperature crossed over 55 C. In silent modality , fans were lay out to operate in stagecoach . devotee would lock at 40 % content until 65 blow , abuse up to 70 % until 85 C , then wage at 100 % at 90 C until temperature come down .
Here is what we saw :
While we steer out in our previous reviews that Zen 4 was designed to take the heat , the non - X Zen 4 mainframe were design to … well , not produce as much of it . While it was a coarse mass with the Ryzen 7000X Series CPUs to see temperatures attain the caloric junction maximal ( Tjmax ) , their non - ten family stayed far by from it .
Graphic: Damien Gula / Gizmodo
At most , we see the Ryzen 5 7600 strike ~55 C over ambient temperatures ( 23.3 vitamin C or 74 F ) in our Handbrake test , but that was as hot as they arrest . Daily use and gaming levitate in the high 30s and low-down 40 Celsius over ambient .
Now , if you ’re cutting - eyed , you ’re in all probability seeing these numbers and remembering that I just made a big deal about using an all - in - one closed loop topology liquid cooler . You ’re proper . But , I did something a bit supererogatory …
Since AMD post us a couple of their Wraith Coolers , I slapped one of the Wraith Prism coolers onto the Ryzen 9 7900 and compact it into a smaller microcomputer causa with fewer fans . Once it was all put together , I put it through a few hour of Cinebench R23 in both single- and multi nub examination , monitoring the heat energy along the way . At most , the 7900 hit 68 light speed for a few abbreviated moments before go under around 65 C. At the most , that ’s 44.7 C over ambient . I even threw a different breeze cooler on the CPU ( NZXT ’s T120 RGB , to be precise ) and the story was exchangeable — just 1 C less all around .
Lower Power Doesn’t Equate Low Performance
AMD delivered a series of CPUs with lower overall baron draw , cost point , and temperatures without losing a raft of performance . A win is a profits … but who is the winnings for ?
The non - ten Ryzen 7000 Series CPUsare a freehanded win for anyone who is face at maximise their dollar in both cost of parting and cost of usance . The fact that each CPU come with a functional melodic line cooler is a huge plus , not to bring up the cost of the Ryzen 5 7600 landing closely to $ 200 at launching . These two things take us a few step closer to being capable to advocate the Ryzen 7000 program for budget form .
Then , there is the power draw poker and thermal carrying out .
The remainder is slight in most individual core , single thread procedure like gaming or web browse . But multi core , multi wander tasks see the largest cutpurse in heat product and baron tie . This overall reduction of power usage and heat production might sit well on the sense of right and wrong ( and wallets ) of the eco- and fiscal minded drug user .
This is usually the part where I would share some unsolicited advice on building a microcomputer using these CPUs . However , with the approaching release of the Ryzen 7000X3D Series , that advice will have to waitress until we know more about the pricing and operation landscape of the platform as a whole .
What I will say is this :
The more that we see of Zen 4 , the more comprehensive our pic of just how powerful this platform is . The more the political platform enlarge , the more options arise for dissimilar types of users . While this is a good thing overall , it can be a bit confusing to know just where to begin .
These water get a little murky , however , as you move up the intersection stack . While high-pitched core numeration and yarn tally are awing and the more sinewy non - ten chips do fall in line of merchandise with their counterpart , the pricing of the high end non - X CPUs is too close and the performance delta too broad to justify a non - 10 central processing unit if power is your sole want . However , if you ’re face at stark gambling operation on a budget , the most humble end of the line - up , the Ryzen 5 7600 , keeps in good gradation with the remainder of its fellowship at a low power draw .
I still maintain that the Ryzen 7 7700X is the darling of the series so far . But , if you ’re looking for versatility and some additional pizzazz for content creation and you have a few more dollar sign to spend , the Ryzen 9 7900 offer 50 % more cores and threads than the 7700X while take hold honest to its low top executive design .
At the end of the day , the 65W Ryzen 7000 Series CPUs are processors you may grow with . Their performance out of the box seat put them in close running with the rest of their family line without pass away crazy on their power phthisis . If power expenditure is n’t as much of a concern , overclocking is available on these CPUs , but you would probably want to scale up your cooling solution if you go down this route . At that level , it might just be more cost effective to look at a Ryzen 7000 Series CPU from the X - family lineup .
Even without overclocking , these are still jolly powerful CPUs . If you ’re look to move to the AM5 program , but score every clam stretch is of high grandness , you would n’t be leaving a whole set of performance on the tabular array if you choke with anon - ecstasy Ryzen 7000 Series CPU .
The product discussed in this clause were provide by the producer for the purposes of reexamination .
IntelNvidiaOverclockingRyzen
Daily Newsletter
Get the best technical school , science , and refinement news program in your inbox day by day .
News from the future , return to your present .
You May Also Like
